Scoring Methodology
Scoring Methodology in the Benchmarking Project
Performance Levels | Scoring | Color Rating | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Company Policy Commitment | Clear and solid policy which meets or exceeds international standards. |
Full Score |
|
|
Vague and general policy that does not meet international standards. |
Half Score |
|
||
No policies. |
Zero Score |
|
||
Project Performance | Measuring scale of environmental and social impacts and risks | Assessments have been appropriately undertaken by taking into account full scope of impacts and cumulative impacts. |
Full Score |
|
Assessments have been appropriately undertaken by taking into account full scope of impacts and cumulative impacts. |
Half Score |
|
||
No appropriate assessments have been undertaken. |
Zero Score |
|
||
Measuring management and monitoring plans and processes | Standardized, appropriate and detailed plans or processes are in place to manage the impacts and risks. |
Full Score |
|
|
General plans or processes are in place to mitigate or manage the impacts and risks. |
Half Score |
|
||
No or minimum plans or processes are in place to manage the impacts or risks. |
Zero Score |
|
||
Measuring outcomes of impacts and risk management | All the relevant elements of best practice have been undertaken. |
Full Score |
|
|
Some best practice elements have been undertaken, and although there are still significant gaps, there is 100% compliance or no reports of non-compliance. |
Half Score |
|
||
There are significant gaps relative to basic practices, and/or evidence of non-compliance or non-conformance. |
Zero Score |
|
||
Measuring transparency and information disclosure | Publicly discloses relevant information through company websites or publicly available upon request. |
Full Score |
|
|
Relevant information is not publicly available. |
Zero Score |
|